Men and their pussies

Posted on 5th July 2008 by kaos in sex - Tags: ,

We have another question. Answers and suggestions are welcome.

What is a man’s fascination with 2 women in a bed together?

Is it the visual of womens legs intertwined and glistening bodies with hands and tongues going everywhere?

Is it the phyhsical intimacy women create between them?

Or is it merely the words such as these that create the visual that makes the idea so appealing?

The next instant her soft lips were pressed against mine. I wrapped my arms around her. I felt the energy flow between our bodies as her hand slide between my legs, finding the moist, warm place that awaited her probing fingers

We need to know. It’s a question that’s vexed many a woman, and we’re no different.

Over to you guys….

Tell others!: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • blogmarks
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Live
  • StumbleUpon

9 Comments »

  1. I suppose it’s because no one ever brought up to most guys the visual of Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas together in bed

    Bet THAT would lessen the novelty.

    :shock:
    kay & may

    Comment by frontier former editor — July 5, 2008 @ 4:03 pm

  2. Uh, am I the only one commenting here?

    we’re in awe of you actually..speechless! we LOVE seeing you come into our comment box {pun intended}..and in fact we’re off over to your place later tonight…hand in hand even!
    :wink:
    kay & may

    Comment by frontier former editor — July 9, 2008 @ 10:34 am

  3. I really don’t know why it is so appealing. I suppose it is just the nature of man. And who am I to question nature?

    who are we to question anyone?? that doesn’t stop us though…we have a lot of curiosity about these things…there will be more oh wise one
    :wink:
    kay & may

    Comment by Pure Evyl — July 10, 2008 @ 9:05 pm

  4. I’ve wondered about this for a long time!!! For me there is little appeal, however, i don’t think like man either…well, most of the time anyway!
    :lol:

    we’d be worried if there WAS a fascnination a-mum! we’re pretty sure you’re female…you are female right???
    kay & may

    Comment by anonymum — July 12, 2008 @ 7:28 pm

  5. And it just occurred to me - why sheer madness? What about fishnet madness or lisle madness or madness with a seam up the calf and back of the thigh? Eh?

    fishnet sounds damned good let me say! i’m thinking we’ll change the tagline!!
    :mrgreen:
    kay & may

    Comment by frontier former editor — July 14, 2008 @ 7:20 pm

  6. Uh, not madness, lunacy. But the stuff about fishnet, lisle and seam up the back of the calf and thigh - that still goes.

    check the tagliine you brilliant man you…it’s in YOUR honor!
    :)
    kay & may

    Comment by frontier former editor — July 14, 2008 @ 7:21 pm

  7. I don’t know what to say . . . . without saying something incredibly salacious, explicit and almost pornographic . . . .

    we’re waiting with anticipation
    :wink:
    kay & may

    Comment by frontier former editor — July 15, 2008 @ 1:01 pm

  8. It’s better than two guys . . . always.
    ~m

    we’ve always suspected that was the main reason..finally, someone who admits it…
    kay & may

    Comment by michaelm — July 17, 2008 @ 11:41 am

  9. I often ask the same question–and I’m a heterosexual male. Two women together neither turns me on nor off. Two men together (even just kissing) repulses me, beyond words. One woman and one man together arouses me strongly. But I always find one woman, by herself, to bring me to climax–especially if she appears shy, innocent, virginal, serious, and sincere (i.e. as if she’s not trying to be sexy).

    Comment by Scott — March 15, 2009 @ 6:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by Critex